Special teachers for abuse of Joo Ho -min's son, 'innocence' ... "Sneak recording, no evidence"
2025-05-13 20:41:05
The Appeals Tribunal did not recognize the evidence of the 'recording', which was the core issue of the case, and destroyed the first trial.
Unlike the first trial, the Appeals Tribunal decided that it could not recognize the evidence of the 'recording' file.
The court said, "It can be seen that the mother of the victim's mother has recorded the recording of the accused and children in the classroom by putting a recorder with a recorder on her children's clothes."
These groups evaluated, "It is a proper ruling that recognizes the legitimate educational activities of special teachers and implements the purpose of the Communication Secret Protection Act, which prohibits the constitution and illegal recording, which defines the inviolability of privacy and communication."
